doctrine.org

The Church (the Body of Christ)

Introduction

What is the Church?  When did it begin?  The answer to the second question depends upon the answer to the first. Seven key passages in the New Testament describe the Church. They are the following: Ephesians 1.22-23; 2.11-22; 3.3-9; Colossians 1.24-27; 1 Corinthians 12.12-13; Galatians 3.26-28, and Romans 16.25-27. These passages provide the needed information to answer these questions.

The Traditional View

The traditional and majority view of Christendom is that the Church, the Body of Christ, began on Pentecost. This study rejects this view. Below is the argument for the traditional view.1

  1. The Church is the Body of Christ (Ephesians 1.22-23; 1 Corinthians 12.12-13; Romans 12.3-5; Colossians 1.24).
  2. Membership into the Body of Christ is through the baptism of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12.13; Galatians 3.27).
  3. The Church was future from Christ’s pre-cross ministry (Matthew 16.18).
  4. The Church was future from Christ pre-ascension ministry (Acts 1.4-5).
  5. The Church was born on the day of Pentecost with the baptism of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2.1-4 cf. Acts 11.16-17).
  6. After Pentecost, the term ἐκκλησία, which had occurred previously only in Matthew 16.18 and 18.17, becomes common, e.g. Acts 5.11, 8.1, 8.3, 9.31, etc.–23 times in Acts and 115 times outside of the Matthew passages.

The logic for the traditional view is the following: The Church is the Body of Christ. Membership into the Body of Christ is through the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The baptism of the Holy Spirit occurred at Pentecost. Therefore, the Church began at Pentecost. The logic of this argument seems well-reasoned and appears strong. However, when other Scriptural data are considered, the traditional view collapses.

Problems for the Traditional View

Three major problems exist for the traditional view. The first is God explicitly stated through the apostle Paul that the Church, the Body of Christ, was a “secret,” (μυστήριον). This presents a serious problem for the traditional view because Paul made this declaration long after Pentecost.

The second problem confirms the first point. No Biblical evidence exists to support the view that anyone at Pentecost recognized that the Church, i.e., the Body of Christ, had come into existence. On the contrary, the Scriptural evidence indicates at Pentecost the Twelve knew nothing about the Body of Christ. Peter only addressed Jews. But Paul declared the Church was that organism in which Jew and Gentile are equal. Peter obviously did not know this else he would have addressed Gentiles. Furthermore, only Paul wrote about the Body of Christ (Romans 12.5; 1 Corinthians 10.16, 17, 12.12, 13, 18, 25, 27; Ephesians 1.23, 2.16, 3.6, 4.4, 12, 16, 5.30; Colossians 1.18, 2.17, 19, 3.15). Such terminology is absent from the Gospels and the letters of Peter, James, John, Jude.

Lastly, Peter and the Eleven were looking for the fulfillment of prophecy, i.e., the kingdom of God on earth which God had revealed through the prophets, not the beginning of a new “Church” age. The Old Testament contains not a word about the Church, the body of Christ. The prophets, John, and Jesus had revealed nothing of the fact that Jew and Gentile would be equal in Christ in a Body. On the contrary, Peter quoted Joel and expected the “sun to be turned into darkness and the moon into blood” (Acts 2.15-21). Peter expected the Lord to come in judgment and to establish His kingdom.

The logical argument for rejecting the traditional view that the Church began on Pentecost is the following: Paul stated the Church, the Body of Christ, was a secret. This means that the Church as the Body of Christ was an unknown entity. Paul declared this long after Pentecost. Nothing from the record at Pentecost indicates the Twelve knew anything about the Body of Christ. Peter and the other disciples knew only about the coming earthly kingdom of God. They knew nothing of Jew and Gentile becoming equal in the “body of Christ” seated in the heavens with heavenly citizenship (Ephesians 1.3; Philippians 3.20; Colossians 1.5). Therefore, it is impossible for the Body of Christ to have begun at Pentecost.

The Meaning of Έκκλησία

Before proceeding further we should examine the Greek word ἐκκλησία. Whenever a word is used in the Scriptures its use must be examined in its context. Just because the same word is used does not ensure that it always has the same meaning. A careful examination of the Scriptures reveals that when Jesus and the Twelve used the word ἐκκλησία it referred to a group of Jews who believed Jesus was the promised Messiah. When Paul used the term, however, it meant the Body of Christ, i.e., equality of Jews and Gentiles in Christ.

The word ἐκκλησία is usually translated “church.” But it is also translated as “assembly” or “congregation.” These were the common translations in the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek translation of the Old Testament. The Hebrew word most often translated into ἐκκλησία is קָהָל which is usually rendered as “assembly” or “congregation.”

A good example of this sense is found in Acts 19.32, 39, 41. When Paul went to Ephesus, he aroused the anger of the silversmiths and other tradesmen whose were in the idol business. One of the silversmiths named Demetrius stirred up a riot against Paul. Each of the verses below contains the Greek word ἐκκλησία. Nowhere do we find the word translated as “church.” In each case the word is translated “assembly.”

  • “So then, some were shouting one thing and some another, for the assembly was in confusion, and the majority did not know for what cause they had come together” (v. 32).
  • “But if you want anything beyond this, it shall be settled in the lawful assembly” (v. 39).
  • “And after saying this he dismissed the assembly” (v. 41).

From the context, we can see that in verses 32 and 41, “crowd” or “mob” would serve as a better translation of ἐκκλησία. In verse 39, “court” would be a better translation. Therefore, while ἐκκλησία is usually translated “church” in the New Testament, it need not be. The basic sense of ἐκκλησία is an assembled group.

The Body of Christ: A Secret

The Church, the Body of Christ, was a new creation, a “secret” (μυστήριον) God revealed to Paul. As such, it did not exist before Paul (Ephesians 3.3-9; Colossians 1.26-27; Romans 16.25-27). Paul wrote to the Ephesians about the Body of Christ. He declared it was a secret God had revealed to him alone. Paul wrote:

1 For this reason I, Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles— if indeed you have heard of the stewardship of God’s grace which was given to me for you; that by revelation there was made known to me the mystery, as I wrote before in brief. By referring to this, when you read you can understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, which in other generations was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed to His holy apostles and prophets in the Spirit; to be specific, that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel, of which I was made a minister, according to the gift of God’s grace which was given to me according to the working of His power. To me, the very least of all saints, this grace was given, to preach to the Gentiles the unfathomable riches of Christ, and to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God who created all things (Ephesians 3:1-10).

Paul wrote the Ephesians that “by revelation” the “secret” was revealed to him (v. 3) and that this secret was unknown to “other generations” and “sons of men” (v. 5). What was this secret? It was, “Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body” (v. 6). What body did Paul mean? He meant the Body of Christ (cf. 1 Corinthians 12.13).

One might be tempted to conclude that when Paul wrote “it has now been revealed to His holy apostles and prophets” that God had revealed this secret to the other apostles, the Twelve. Reading further into this passage reveals this was not the case. Paul had declared this secret was to him (v. 2-3) and that God gave him the grace to preach to the Gentiles the “unfathomable riches of Christ and to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God” (v. 7-9). The Twelve learned about the “secret” of the body of Christ through Paul. No Biblical evidence exists to support the view that they knew of it before Paul. The doctrine of the Body of Christ is unique to Paul. No other Biblical writer mentions it. The passages in Acts which recorded the events surrounding Pentecost provide evidence the Twelve knew nothing of the Body of Christ. God did not reveal this “secret” to them. Consider Paul’s words to the Colossians:

24 Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I do my share on behalf of His body, which is the church, in filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions. 25 Of this church I was made a minister according to the stewardship from God bestowed on me for your benefit, so that I might fully carry out the preaching of the word of God, 26 that is, the mystery which has been hidden from the past ages and generations, but has now been manifested to His saints, 27 to whom God willed to make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory (Colossians 1.24-27).

Note carefully Paul’s words. Paul wrote, “of this church I was made a minister” (v. 25). Which church did Paul mean? Did he mean the Jewish church to which the Twelve had been ministering? No, he meant the Body of Christ. Notice the personal pronoun “I.” Were Peter and the Eleven ministers of the Body of Christ? They were not if we accept what Paul wrote. This was a ministry the ascended Lord gave to Paul, not the Twelve. More evidence of this fact is in Paul’s letter to the Galatians. Paul wrote:

But from those who were of high reputation (what they were makes no difference to me; God shows no partiality)—well, those who were of reputation contributed nothing to me. But on the contrary, seeing that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised (for He who effectually worked for Peter in his apostleship to the circumcised effectually worked for me also to the Gentiles), and recognizing the grace that had been given to me, James and Cephas and John, who were reputed to be pillars, gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, so that we might go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised (Galatians 2:6-9).

Paul met with the Twelve and declared his gospel to them (Galatians 2.2). He revealed God had commissioned him as the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11.13; Ephesians 3.1) and that his gospel was the “gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20.24). The Lord did not appoint the Twelve as apostles to the Gentiles and had not been ministering to Gentiles (Matthew 10.5-7; Acts 11.19). They were apostles to Israel (cf. Matthew 19.28). No scripture indicates the Twelve ever had a ministry to Gentiles. They did not preach the “gospel of the grace of God.” They preached “the gospel of the kingdom.” In their meeting with Paul, the Twelve officially recognized and set as policy that Paul would go to the Gentiles and that they would go to the Jews. It is helpful to pause and consider when this occurred. Paul was probably converted about 37 A.D. He spent three years in the desert in Arabia. In about 50-51 A.D. the counsel in Jerusalem met (Acts 15). After this, Paul wrote Galatians–perhaps in about 54 A.D. Therefore, a considerable amount of time had passed when Paul met with the leaders of the Twelve. During this time the Twelve had never evangelized Gentiles (with the exception of Peter’s meeting with Cornelius–Acts 10). The reason they had not done so was because they were operating under the kingdom program. They were still operating under the instructions the Lord had given them earlier:

These twelve Jesus sent out after instructing them: Do not go in the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter any city of the Samaritans; but rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as you go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. (Matthew 10.5-7).

The Twelve ministered to Israel and preached the gospel of the kingdom. They knew Israel must repent for the kingdom of God to come and that it would be in this kingdom that Gentiles could be blessed according to prophecy. They knew nothing about “the Body of Christ” even after Pentecost. Outside of Peter’s going to the house of Cornelius in Acts 10, no Scripture supports the view that the Twelve ever had a ministry to Gentiles. Luke’s account of Peter’s visit to Cornelius reveals Peter did not initiate the visit and that the Twelve were outraged when they learned he had gone to a Gentile’s house. Only when Peter recounted the entire story of how he came to go to Cornelius’ were they silenced. But even after Peter’s defense before his fellow apostles we read,

So then those who were scattered because of the persecution that arose in connection with Stephen made their way to Phoenicia and Cyprus and Antioch, speaking the word to no one except to Jews alone (Acts 11.19).

Could words be more clear?

What Was Pentecost?

Pentecost was a Jewish feast day which occurred fifty days after Passover. It was the time that Jesus told His disciples to await and remain in Jerusalem to receive the Holy Spirit (Luke 24.49; John 14.16-17, 26, 15.26; Acts 1.8). The coming of the Holy Spirit was a key component of God’s prophetic program to Israel (cf. Isaiah 44.3, 59.21). It was not the birth to the Church, the Body of Christ for nothing in the Old Testament spoke of the Church. Rather, the baptism of the Holy Spirit was an essential part of the fulfillment of the New Covenant which Jesus had initiated at the Last Supper (Matthew 26.27-28). God had promised through His prophets that He would make a new covenant with them different from the old or Mosaic covenant. Jeremiah had written:

But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD, I will put My law within them, and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people (Jeremiah 31.33 cf. Ezekiel 11. 16-21).

Jesus initiated the New Covenant at the Last Supper. During the three years prior to this event He preached that the kingdom of God was near. His death and resurrection fulfilled all that was required to atone for sin. He had risen from the dead. At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit descended and Jewish believers were baptized. Israel was at the threshold of achieving all that the prophets had foretold. Only one thing was required: the nation had to repent (Acts 2.38; 3.19a). If they would, God would establish His kingdom on the earth (Acts 3.19b-21; cf. Matthew 6.9-10).

Peter and the apostles understood the great prophetic plan was unfolding according to the Scriptures. The great hope of the prophets was the kingdom of God on earth. Jesus had preached that this kingdom was near for three years. The disciples understood this clearly. The last question they asked Jesus before he ascended was about the kingdom. In Acts 1.7 they asked, “Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?” And why not?  Jesus had promised they would rule over the twelve tribes of Israel in this kingdom (Matthew 19.28; Luke 22.30). Wouldn’t you have done this same?

Who was Peter’s audience at Pentecost? Pentecost was a Jewish feast day. The nation of Israel had assembled for Pentecost. The Holy Spirit was poured out upon them as John and Jesus had prophesied. The result was that they spoke in unlearned, foreign languages. What also happened? They received power as Jesus had told them in Acts 1.8. What was this power? They were able to perform the same kind of miracles Jesus had performed in his earthly ministry to authenticate His messiahship. These miraculous powers confirmed their ongoing divine message and program that Jesus was the prophesied Messiah and that the kingdom was near if the nation would repent. What was Peter’s message to the Jews? He said,

19 Therefore repent and return, so that your sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord; 20 and that He may send Jesus, the Christ appointed for you, 21 whom heaven must receive until the period of restoration of all things about which God spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from ancient time (Acts 3.19-21).

He told the Jews that if they would repent God would send the “times of refreshing.” What was the “times of refreshing” but the prophetic and covenanted promise of the kingdom of God on earth. This was the first clear offer of the establishment of kingdom of God to Israel. Prior to this time, the kingdom had been “near.” This message was still “all Jew.” No Gentiles were in view. Therefore, it makes no sense for the Church, the Body of Christ, to have begun at Pentecost when Peter continued to preach the prophesied “kingdom of God” to Jews only following Pentecost.

Had Israel repented and accepted Jesus as the Messiah, the apostles would have begun to “make disciples of all the nations” (Matthew 28.19-20). Gentiles would have found salvation and blessing through Israel in fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant and the other prophetic Scriptures. This was the whole point behind the Great Commission. Israel refused to repent, however. But the plan and will of God cannot be defeated. One day Israel will repent. The prophesied kingdom the prophets, John, and Jesus proclaimed will be established. But for now, in this present time, according to Paul, Israel’s transgression has resulted in placing Gentiles into the place of blessing (Romans 11.11-12) and has brought reconciliation to the whole world (Romans 11.15). Had Israel obeyed God, the Gentiles would have been blessed through the success of Israel. But in grace, Gentiles are being blessed due to the failure of Israel. Men fail but God is gracious. Our God is indeed awesome.

Removal of Jewish and Gentiles distinctions that characterized the Jewish program clearly did not occur at Pentecost. Peter addressed only Jews in Acts: “men of Judea,” Acts 2.14; “men of Israel,” Acts 2.22; “brethren,” Acts 2.29; “all the house of Israel,” Acts 2.36; “men of Israel,” Acts 3.12; “brethren,” Acts 3.17; “you who are the sons of the prophets and the covenant which God made with your fathers,” Acts 3.25. We have no hint that Gentiles were included in Peter’s message. The apostolic focus continued to be the prophetic plan, i.e. repentance and preaching the kingdom of God that had begun under John the Baptizer and Jesus.

The Jewish or Prophetic Program

All of the attention of the gospels and the first half of the book of Acts (including Pentecost) is upon Jews. Gentiles are hardly in view. Matthew 18 provides a good example of how the word ἐκκλησία should be interpreted prior to Paul. Jesus said,

15 If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. 16 But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every fact may be confirmed. 17 If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. 18 Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven (Matthew 18.15-17).

In this passage, Jesus instructed His disciples on how to deal with a sinning brother. He enumerated a series of procedural steps to follow. One of these restorative steps for the sinning brother who continued to be recalcitrant and unrepentant was to take the problem to the church, (ἐκκλησία). If the sinning brother refused to listen to the church, then he was to be regarded as a “Gentile and a tax collector.” This statement only makes sense in a Jewish context. It make no sense whatever in the existing Body of Christ. Jesus clearly maintained the distinction between Jew and Gentile. Such a distinction is now over. How do we know? Paul revealed that the Church is composed of both Jews and Gentiles and that they are equal in Christ.

Some may be troubled by the fact that Jesus made a distinction between Jew and Gentile and that under his teaching the Jew had priority. This priority had been God’s plan ever since God chose Abraham from among the Gentiles to be the father of a new race through whom He would reveal Himself and establish covenants. By means of this calling, God chose to reveal Himself through the Jewish people to the Gentiles. When Jesus came, He preached repentance to Israel and presented Himself to the nation as her Messiah. Establishment of his kingdom was contingent upon Israel’s repentance and acceptance of Jesus as Messiah.

Failure to recognize the nature of Jesus’ mission has led to serious interpretive errors. Tragically, many people have been taught that Jesus came to found the Church. Even a cursory reading of the Gospels reveals this is false. Jesus did not come to found the Church; He came to present Himself to Israel as their Messiah-King (cf. Romans 15.8). His message to the nation was one of repentance because the kingdom of heaven was near, i.e., the King was present. Repentance was the basis on which the Messianic kingdom, prophesied by the Jewish prophets for hundreds of years, was to be established. God’s prophetic program was “Jew first.” Once the Jewish nation repented and accepted Jesus as their King God would establish his earthly kingdom. Israel would then fulfill its destiny as the source of blessing to the Gentiles (cf. Zechariah 8.20-23; Isaiah 42.6-7; Luke 2.32; Acts 13.44-48). Because of this prophetic plan, Jesus ordered his disciples not to go to the Gentiles (Matthew 10.5-7).

Jesus rarely interacted with Gentiles. One exception was the Roman centurion Matthew recorded in his gospel in chapter 8. Another was the Canaanite woman in Matthew 15.21-28. Jesus told this woman when she confronted him, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Could words be more clear? If Jesus commanded his disciples not to go to Gentiles He could not have been forming the Church, the Body of Christ, in which Jew and Gentile are equal. Jesus made an exception with the Canaanite woman. He yielded to her plea to heal her demon-possessed daughter because in the midst of an unbelieving and obstinate Israel, a Gentile woman responded in faith to Jesus. She followed the pattern of Jacob, who refused to turn loose of the God-man he wrestled at Peniel until he was blessed, and Ruth, who refused to turn loose of Naomi. Even though the woman wasn’t Jewish, even though she didn’t fit into Jesus’ immediate mission, Jesus made an exception to the divine plan of “Jew first” and responded to her because of her great faith. Jesus said to her,

O woman your faith is great; be it done for you as you wish. And her daughter was healed at once (Matthew 15.28).

As late as Acts 10, long after Pentecost, Peter and the apostles had gone to no Gentiles. In Acts 10, God gave Peter a vision and a specific command to go to the Gentile Cornelius’ house. Peter obeyed, but not joyfully. Luke recorded,

14 But Peter said, “By no means, Lord, for I have never eaten anything unholy and unclean.” 15 Again a voice came to him a second time, What God has cleansed, no longer consider unholy. 16 This happened three times, and immediately the object was taken up into the sky (Acts 10.14-16).

27 As he talked with him, he entered and found many people assembled. 28 And he said to them, You yourselves know how unlawful it is for a man who is a Jew to associate with a foreigner or to visit him; and yet God has shown me that I should not call any man unholy or unclean (Acts. 10.27-28).

How did Peter’s fellow apostles respond to Peter’s action?  Did they say, “Wonderful! God has sent you to the Gentiles to preach the gospel!” Hardly, Read Luke’s record:

1 Now the apostles and the brethren who were throughout Judea heard that the Gentiles also had received the word of God. And when Peter came up to Jerusalem, those who were circumcised took issue with him, saying, You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them (Acts 11.1-3).

They “took issue with him.” In their view, Peter had abandoned the divine program. Only after Peter related the entire episode did his fellow Jews quiet down and accept him. Peter concluded:

17 Therefore if God gave to them the same gift as He gave to us also after believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God’s way? 18 When they heard this, they quieted down and glorified God, saying, Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life (Acts 11.17-18).

Jesus proclaimed the prophetic plan of God. This plan had been manifested and prophesied throughout the Old Testament by the prophets. God further revealed the plan through his covenants with Israel. But God also had a μυστήριον or “secret” plan unknown and unrevealed until he disclosed it to Paul. God revealed his “secret” following Israel’s rejection of the Messiah. Paul wrote about this in Romans 11.25-27:

25 For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery—so that you will not be wise in your own estimation—that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; 26 and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, The Deliverer will come from ZionHe will remove ungodliness from Jacob27 This is My covenant with themWhen I take away their sins.

The Lord Jesus Christ is the foundation of the Church but His earthly ministry was to Israel, not the Church. Paul is the founder of the Church, the Body of Christ, because God revealed this new program through him. The Lord Jesus as the foundation of the Church is its Head and Lord (not King) and this relationship is heavenly, not earthly.

The Baptism of the Holy Spirit

We have noted that the baptism of the Holy Spirit occurred at Pentecost. Was this the same baptism that Paul described in 1 Corinthians 12? According to what Paul wrote the Corinthians, the Holy Spirit is the baptizer of the Church:

12 For even as the body is one and yet has many members, and all the members of the body, though they are many, are one body, so also is Christ. 13 For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit (1 Corinthians 12.12-13).

The Holy Spirit is the person of the Godhead who baptizes us into Christ as the Body of Christ. In the Jewish program for the Jewish Church present at Pentecost, Jesus is the baptizing agent, however. He is the baptizer of Israel (Matthew 3.11; Mark 1.8; Luke 3.16; John 1.33 cf. Acts 1.4-5; 11.15-16).  John the Baptist prophesied saying,

As for me, I baptize you with water for repentance, but He who is  coming after me is mightier than I, and I, and am not fit to remove His sandals; He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire (Matthew 3.11).

According to John the Baptist’s testimony, Jesus was the one who was the baptizer of believers at Pentecost. Jesus had promised the Holy Spirit before his crucifixion (John 14.16-17, 25-26; 15.26-27; 16.5-15). After his resurrection he told his disciples:

For John baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now (Acts 1.5).

Christ’s Death As Good News

Peter’s message in Acts was a message of repentance. His message echoed the message of John the Baptist, Jesus, and the Twelve except that it followed Jesus’ resurrection. Peter did not preach the death of Christ as a glorious victory over sin but as a cause of condemnation for Israel. As for Christ’s resurrection, it offered the nation a renewed opportunity to accept their King and bring forth the promised kingdom. Not until Paul was Christ’s death and resurrection preached as good news and the message of reconciliation declared (2 Corinthians 5.18-21). For Peter, the kingdom of God, proclaimed throughout the gospels, was still the plan of God. He called upon the nation to repent and be baptized for the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2.38). Paul’s message was “believe and be saved” not “repent and be baptized.” Paul’s gospel is the message for the Church today.

All Goods Common

Notice also in Acts 2 that the believers in Jerusalem sold their possessions and held them in common. Such was the character of the Jerusalem church.  Jesus required this for citizens of the kingdom of God (cf. Matthew 19.21; Mark 10.21; Luke 12.33, 18.22). The disciples, obedient to Jesus, left everything to follow Him (cf. Matthew 19.27; Mark 10.28; Luke 5.11, 28). How many sermons have you heard a preacher tell his congregation to sell their possessions and give the money to the church? Paul never told believers to leave everything, sell their possessions, and give them to the Church. A new and different order began with Paul–the Church, the Body of Christ.

The Church and Israel

The Church is composed of all believers who have put their trust for salvation in the death and resurrection of Christ (1 Corinthians 15.1-4). Unlike Israel, the Church is not under a covenantal relationship with God. Prior to the calling of Abraham, God made a covenant with mankind through Noah in which he promised never again to destroy the world with a flood cf. Genesis 9.9-17. After God created the Hebrew race he made covenants with them (see the Covenants of Israel). But God never made a covenant with the Church. God’s relationship to the Church is grace alone and is not under the Law of Moses. The Church does, however, share in the blessings of the New Covenant as the blessing of this covenant are spiritual rather than physical (as are the blessings of the other covenants).

The Church is separate and distinct from Israel. The below chart outlines the key differences.

IsraelChurch
Established by and under covenantsEstablished by grace alone (a “secret”)
Has earthly promisesHas heavenly promises
Operates under LawOperates under Grace
Is a KingdomIs a Body
Christ is KingChrist is Head

Israel was established by a covenant God made with Abraham who became the father of the Jewish race. Subsequent covenants followed. The final covenant was the New Covenant. The Church’s life is Christ as his Body. The Church was a creation held secret in the mind of God until God revealed the secret to Paul (Ephesians 2.11-22; 3.3-9; Colossians 1.26-27). Both Israel and the Church are beneficiaries in God’s plan under the “eternal covenant” (Hebrews 13.20-21). This covenant was not made with either Israel or the Church. The Eternal Covenant was sovereignly made by God the Father and God the Son in eternity past as the means of redeeming fallen mankind, solving the problem of evil, and bringing glory to God.  The Church’s domain and destiny is heaven (Philippians 3.20). Israel’s promised realm is earth (Matthew 6.9-10). God promised Israel an earthly kingdom (Acts 1.6). The Church has no earthly kingdom. The operative means of life for the Church is grace (Romans 6.12). Throughout most its history the nation of Israel operated under the Law of Moses and Jesus operated under the Law (Matthew 8.4) during his earthly ministry. In a future day, under the New Covenant, Israel will have the Law written on their hearts (Jeremiah 31.33). The Church is described as the Body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12.12-13, 27). Israel is described as a kingdom.  Jesus is the Head of the Church, i.e., the Body of Christ, (Ephesians 1.22). He is never called the King of the Church. Jesus is the King of Israel (Luke 1.31-33). Ironically, the Roman governor Pilate, a Gentile, recognized Jesus’ Jewish kingship (Matthew 27.37; Mark 15.26; Luke 23.38; John 19.17-22 cf. John 18.33-39) even though the Jews rejected His title (Matthew 27.29-31; Mark 15.17-20; Luke 23.35). In the Messianic kingdom, Jesus will rule as Israel’s King in his role as David’s greater Son. In this role he will fulfill the Abrahamic, Davidic, Sabbatic, and New covenants.

These twenty-one proofs from Acts show the Church did not begin at Pentecost:

1. The coming of the Holy Spirit was a Jewish promise, the New Covenant, which promised forgiveness of sins and the indwelling Spirit to Jews (cf. Jeremiah 31.31-34; Ezekiel 11.16-20, 36.21-28; Joel 2.28-29). This covenant promise was associated with God’s regathering Jews into the promised land. Peter quoted Joel’s prophecy (Acts 2.16-21), which stated the Spirit would be poured on “all flesh.” The verses that follow qualify “all flesh” meant Jews, not “every person”—“your sons,” “your daughters,” “your old men,” “your young men.” Nothing in the New Covenant indicated the Holy Spirit coming on Gentiles.
2. Pentecost was a Jewish feast. Peter addressed Jews, not Gentiles (Acts 2.14, 22-23, 29, 30, 37, 38-39). He knew what the prophets wrote and Pentecost began the fulfillment of their prophecies. If this was the beginning of the Church, the body of Christ, Peter would have addressed Jews and Gentiles, not just Jews.
3. Peter’s address said nothing about the Church, the body of Christ, in which Jew and Gentile are equal in Christ. Everything in Peter’s address was Jewish; Gentiles were not in view. The idea of Jew and Gentile being equal was absent from the thinking of Peter and the other apostles.
4. Peter addressed the Jews about the crime of crucifying their Messiah. When they asked him what they should do, did Peter tell them to believe Christ died for their sins and rose from the dead for salvation (Paul’s gospel)? No. He told them, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for forgiveness of your sins and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2.38). Is this the message of salvation today for one who becomes a member of the Church?
5. Peter told the Jews to be baptized “in the name of Jesus Christ” (Acts 2.38) and healed the lame man at the Temple “on the faith of His name” (Acts 3.16). “His name,” spoke of Jesus’ identity, who He was, throughout the Gospels. This was the gospel of the kingdom. Did Peter tell the lame man to believe Christ died for his sins and rose from the dead for salvation (Acts 3.6)? Did he tell the Jews this after the healing of the lame man (Acts 3.11-21)? Why not, if the Church began at Pentecost? The message of Paul’s gospel for those who become members of the Church is not to believe in Christ’s identity (cf. Matthew 16.16; John 1.49, 11.27; Acts 8.37) but to believe in His work—He died for our sins and rose from the dead. Peter said nothing of this at Pentecost.
6. After Pentecost, Peter continued to address only Jews (cf. Acts 3.2-26, 4.8-12). If the Church began at Pentecost, why did Peter not address Gentiles?
7. Those who believed Peter’s message sold their possessions and held everything in common (Acts 2.44-45). Do members of the Church, the body of Christ, do this? If the Church begin at Pentecost, why not? Why do church members not hold everything in common like those who believed Peter’s message after Pentecost? What would happen if a pastor told his congregation to sell everything—stocks, bonds, houses, lands, etc. and put the proceeds into a common fund for all to use?
8. If the Church began at Pentecost, what was the case of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5.1-11) who sold their possessions but concealed some of the proceeds? Peter declared they lied to the Holy Spirit and God struck them dead. Is this the nature of the Church, the body of Christ today? What happened to Ananias and Sapphira was a picture of Christ’s earthly kingdom where He will rule with a rod of iron. Peter exercised the authority the Lord gave the Twelve to rule and judge the twelve tribes in the kingdom (Matthew 19.28). The Lord did not promise the Twelve authority over the Church, but rule over Israel, Jews. How could the Church begin at Pentecost when the Lord gave them no authority over the Church?
9. What are we to make of the healings, signs and wonders that continued, the lame man Peter and John healed at the Temple (Acts 3.1-10), the apostles’ healing the sick and removing demons (Acts 5.12-16), Philip’s healing and expelling demons in Samaria (Acts 8.5-7)? Do these acts characterize the Church, the body of Christ? Why not? These miracles were signs to prove to Israel that the apostles’ message that Jesus was the Christ was true.
10. If the Church began at Pentecost, why were all believers not filled with the Holy Spirit? Acts 8.14-19 states Peter and John went to Samaria after they learned the Samaritans had been saved and prayed and laid hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit. Does this sound like the Church? Do ministers or fellow believers pray and lay hands on new believers to receive the Holy Spirit? Over a decade after Pentecost Paul encountered believers who knew nothing of the Holy Spirit. Paul laid his hands on them and they received Him (Acts 19.2-6). If the Church began at Pentecost, why did these believers not have the Spirit? For the Church, one who believes Paul’s gospel is immediately indwelt with the Spirit (1 Corinthians 12.13; 2 Corinthians 1.22, 5.5; Ephesians 1.13). It is not a later event.
11. In Acts 8.22, Peter told Simon to repent from his evil and pray to the Lord so he might be forgiven. Are members of the Church, the body of Christ, told to repent and pray that our sins might be forgiven after we believe? On the contrary, we are told we have been forgiven (Ephesians 1.7, 4.32; Colossians 1.14, 2.13, 3.13). Why did Peter not tell Simon this? He did not tell him, because he did not know this. This was a Pauline revelation. The same is seen in 1 John 1.9. Members of the Church are never told to confess our sins so we might be forgiven. John knew nothing about Church truths, for God had not yet revealed them.
12. How was the Ethiopian eunuch saved after Philip witnessed to him? Did he believe Christ died for his sins and rose from the dead, how one becomes a member of the Church, the body of Christ? Did Philip tell him this? Acts 8 states Philip proclaimed the gospel to him—Jesus—the gospel of the kingdom—that Jesus of Nazareth was the Messiah. The Ethiopian responded, “I believe Jesus Christ is the Son of the God” (Acts 8.37). Is the message of salvation today to believe Jesus is the Son of God? Or, is one saved by believing Christ died for one’s sins and rose from the dead? What occurred next? The Ethiopian was baptized. Several passages state that under the gospel of the kingdom, water baptism was required for salvation (Mark 1.4, 16.16; Luke 3.3; John 3.5; Acts 2.38, 22.16). Is water baptism required for salvation under Paul’s gospel? Is water baptism required to become a member of the Church, the body of Christ? Paul wrote there is one baptism, the baptism of the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 4.5). One means one. Water baptism is outside the realm of salvation under Paul’s gospel. No church should be practicing water baptism. To do so is to disobey God.
13. What did Paul believe in the case of his salvation? When he met the Lord on the road to Damascus, he asked, “Who are you, Lord?” That was the appropriate question under the gospel of the kingdom. The Lord asked His disciples, “Who do you say I am?” Peter responded that He was the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matthew 16.15-16). After Paul was saved, what did he immediately proclaim in the synagogues? He declared, “He is the Son of the God” (Acts 9.20). Paul was also water baptized for remission of sins. Ananias declared, “When you get up, be baptized and wash away your sins after you call on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22.16). Are our sins washed away with water baptism? No. We have forgiveness of sins by believing Christ died for us and rose from the dead, Paul’s gospel (1 Corinthians 15.1-4; Galatians 1.11-12; Ephesians 6.19). This did not occur at Pentecost.
14. Throughout Acts, before Paul’s salvation, the salvation message was proclaimed to Jews only. No Gentile evangelism occurred. Acts 8.1 (years after Pentecost) states that even under intense persecution the apostles did not leave Jerusalem. Why? Their focus was Israel’s repentance. For Jesus to return, every Jew had to repent (Acts 2.36, 38-39; cf. Matthew 23.37-39). Jesus gave them the order of their ministry: Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, and then the ends of the earth (Acts 1.8), Jew first. Is this the order of evangelism in the Church?
15. Acts 10 records Peter’s receiving the vision of the sheet and the command to go to Cornelius’ house, a Gentile. If Peter and the apostles were evangelizing Gentiles, why the command? Why did Peter tell Cornelius it was not permitted for a Jew to visit and associate with a Gentile if they were evangelizing Gentiles (Acts 10.28)? Does this sound like the Church, in which Jew and Gentile are equal in Christ, with no distinction between Jew and Gentile?
16. When Cornelius and his household believed Peter’s message and the Holy Spirit came on them, why were Peter and the six Jews with him astonished “that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on the Gentiles” (Acts 10.45). If the Church began at Pentecost, if they had been evangelizing Gentiles, would they be astonished? Does this make any sense?
17. In Acts 11.1 we read, “Now the apostles and the brethren who were in Judea heard that the Gentiles also received the word of the God.” If the Twelve and the believing Jews in Judea had been engaged in Gentile evangelism would this have been news? It was news because it had not been occurring.
18. After Peter returned to Jerusalem, why did the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem upbraid him for visiting Cornelius? They declared, “You went to uncircumcised men—and ate with them!” (Acts 11.3). If the Church began at Pentecost, would Gentiles not have been brought into the Church after over a decade? If the Holy Spirit came on and had been indwelling both Jews and Gentiles at Pentecost, why did Peter say, “Therefore, if the God gave the same gift to them as also to us after we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, how could I hinder the God (Acts 11.17)? How did they reply? They said, “So the God gave repentance to life also to the Gentiles” (Acts 11.18). If the Church began at Pentecost, does Peter’s statement make any sense? Does their response make any sense?
19. If Gentiles were being brought into the Church, the body of Christ, since Pentecost, why does Acts 11.19 state that those who were scattered as a result of Stephen’s persecution (Acts 8.1, 4) travelled to Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch, “speaking the word to no one except Jews only?” Could the Church begin at Pentecost if no Gentile evangelism occurred for more than a decade?
20. Why did the Twelve send Barnabas to Antioch (Acts 11.22-24) when they learned Gentiles were being saved from the Jewish ministry in Acts 11.20? What was the gospel they proclaimed? They proclaimed “the gospel—the Lord Jesus”—the gospel of the kingdom, who Jesus was, His identity—not that He died for our sins and rose from the dead.
21. Why was the first thing Barnabas did after he confirmed Gentiles were being saved was to find Paul and bring him to Antioch (Acts 11.25-26)? Were the Jerusalem leaders unable to deal with Gentile believers if the Church began more than a decade earlier?

Could Paul write that the Church was unknown in other generations, revealed to him if the Church began at Pentecost (Ephesians 3.1-10, 6.19)? What occurred at Pentecost was no secret. Jeremiah and Ezekiel wrote about it 600 years before Christ. Jesus told His apostles to stay in Jerusalem until they were “clothed with power from on high” (Luke 24.49). None of this was a secret. What was secret was that God would create a new entity, the Church, the body of Christ, in which Jew and Gentile were equal in Christ through faith alone, believing Christ died for one’s sins and rose from the dead. That did not happen at Pentecost.

Conclusion

God established the Church, the Body of Christ, with the conversion and commission of Paul as the apostle to the Gentiles. It has the following characteristics.

  • The Church is the Body of Christ (Ephesians 1.22-23; 1 Corinthians 12.12-13; Colossians 1.24).
  • All who put their trust in Christ in this age are members of the Body of Christ, i.e., the Church (1 Corinthians 12.12-13).
  • Membership into the Body of Christ, i.e., the Church, is through the baptism of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12.13; Galatians 3.27).
  • One is baptized by the Holy Spirit when one exercises faith in Christ (Galatians 3.26-27).
  • Members of Christ’s body, i.e., the Church, are indwelt by Christ (Colossians 1.27).

In order to understand what “church” means one must make Scriptural distinctions and understand where one falls in God’s plan. A “church,” an ἐκκλησία, in the broad sense of an assembly of those who have put their trust in YHVH or Jesus. In Jesus’ day, the “church” or “assembly” was composed of those who repented, were baptized, and believed that He was the promised Messiah. This was the requirement to be a citizen of the Messianic Kingdom. Through Paul, God created a new entity, the Church, the body of Christ, in which no distinction exists between Jew and Gentile. This was a “secret” God revealed to Paul alone. Paul was commissioned as the “apostle to the Gentiles” (Romans 11.13) who revealed this new Church, the Body of Christ. These key verses describe the Church: Galatians 3.26-29, 1 Corinthians 12.12-13, Ephesians 1.22-23, Ephesians 2.11-22, Ephesians 3.1-10, Colossians 1.24-27.

For further reading about other “secrets” God revealed to Paul alone, see the author’s article, Paul’s “Mystery”. Also, see the author’s Paul: Chief of Sinners? for a discussion of when the Church began.

1 S. Lewis Johnson, “The Birth of the Church.” Dr. Johnson’s excellent lecture is online and the text above summarizes his argument. Dr. Johnson went to be with the Lord, January 28, 2004. He now knows the Church, the Body of Christ, began with Paul, not at Pentecost. Given his wit and humor, this knowledge must be a source of mirth to him.

©1999 Don Samdahl. Anyone is free to reproduce this material and distribute it, but it may not be sold.

Updated April 25, 2015

image_pdfimage_print

491 thoughts on “The Church (the Body of Christ)

  1. Daniel J Stanton

    Paul taught for more than a whole year in the Antioch church; then the moniker of Christian was added, how can it be inaccurate to say, Paul, without a doubt was the first Christian? He alone wrote Christian doctrine. What the term Christian came to refer to makes no difference, at the time it was coined, it meant Paul was the first Christian, and he spent more than a year teaching disciples Christian doctrines. This is one topic I thought we would agree on, but I guess I’m found wrong again.

  2. Bahate

    Don,

    Thank you for the work you are doing.

    I have a point that I seek your input so much. It appears, there is a need to consider the “Church, the Body of Christ” from both angles: 1. as a Spiritual body 2. as a functional earthly body (a social gathering).

    I have come to realize that failure to know these two states of this ” Church, the Body of Christ” causes some confusion even to those of us who rightly divide. For example, we know the Church is a spiritual body which a believer becomes part of, spiritually, through the work of the Holy Spirit. We all know this.

    But then, there is this gathering of the saints/believers physically (socially) where we happen to be functioning here on earth (as a church/local church, etc). There is need to make good clarifications on these two states. I know that in Christendom, most people know only of the physical gathering, the social gathering as the church, a point which has caused so much damage to the name of the Church the Body of Christ as a whole. This is because to most professing Christians, they have the power to register members and unregister into the body of Christ without any sense that it is the Holy Spirit who does that and that human beings have no role regarding that work.

    Form this point of view, there is a question of why did apostle Paul seem to recognize the churches as the physical entities when he addressed them in his epistles?. This seems to contribute more confusion to many to the point where they think the church is the physical entity, and none about the spirit body.

    Although I personally understand how these two sides of the same coin exists and functions, I ask for some more insight on this because it is not being tackled well enough to give proper understanding on the same.

    God bless you all.

    1. doctrine Post author

      Bahate,
      Thank you. The Church, the body of Christ, is a new creation, a new order. Before the Church, God divided the human race into Jew and Gentile. Beginning with Paul, He created a new division, Church. So we now have Jew, Gentile, and Church. When one believes Paul’s gospel, one becomes “Church,” neither Jew nor Gentile. The social gather of believers in church is a gathering of members on the Church, the body of Christ, that is, believers, and non-believers, those who are not part of the Church, the body of Christ. In America, most of the people who attend church are not members of the Church, the body of Christ. Paul dealt with members of the Church, the body of Christ. He told believers to disassociate from those who did not hold to his teachings.

      1. Bahate

        Don,

        Thank you. I appreciate your input as well as some clarifications. It’s indeed very paramount to understand these two spheres of the Church.

  3. TEnglish

    Greetings Don;

    I am a male member of the body of Christ. Please elaborate on 1 Tim. 2.11. I am very appreciative
    of many, both female and male, who are following Christ as He through the Apostle Paul has revealed so many truths today. As social media is global, I see believers sharing wonderful truths given by Christ to the Apostle Paul: its a joy to see many of the articles you espouse – these same truths are being shared in Italy, India, the Philippines, Africa, and beyond. My concern, is that many women are articulating these truths relentlessly and I wonder if it is the proper venue and sphere to share? Please expound on women’s leadership roles and teaching ministry in the church today. Is the instruction from women to be situational or universal in nature? Thank you!

    1. doctrine Post author

      TEnglish,
      This is both a simple and complex subject. It is simple in the sense that Paul’s desire was to maintain the divine creative order and purpose of men and women that he wrote about in 1 Corinthians 1.1-16. Women can do everything a man can do as long as this creative order is maintained. In the 1 Timothy 2.11-14, Paul returned to this creative order, telling the women to learn in “quietness,” which seems to mean not to be busybodies or overbearing, not to teach or dominate a man. Where it becomes complex is when men fail in their creative responsibility as leaders. In those cases, women will step into that role. We see this in the case of Deborah in the Bible. In other examples, we see women running governments, e.g., Margaret Thatcher, because the men failed: she was smarter and had more courage than the men around her.

      1. Bobbi

        Hi Don..🤗.
        I wonder if we all realize WHO is getting saved today ? We are SINNERS of the Nations, saved by grace in the fulness of God’s provision in Christ. Male AND female. Now… I am a sister. A woman whom God has saved. My husband is NOT . Yet i got saved at home alone. Was given a need to study. Furiously! To see for myself all about God and Jesus Christ and my salvation, which i continue to do, as God helps. .

        We are imho so far along in the times and seasons that surely “the day is at hand”. Paul’s warning about Wolves is about men, drawing others to follow them and not follow God in the Bible. Acts 20:29 This was still in the days of his to the Jew first ministry. So how much more so among the Nations to whom God’s Salvation has been sent! Acts.28;28, Rom.16:25,26, Eph.3:1-6

        Paul’s exhortation to pray for all men is valid. There is so much deception today in ” churchy” groups
        that follow traditions of men, who may not have received how to follow Paul who follows Christ! To study and follow Paul along and to see “Christ in Paul” is a marvelous thing! Gal.1:15,16, Is.49, Col.1:27 And the things he preached are the commandments of the Lord.

        The created order of male and female Is the type of Christ and the true church…saved believers.
        It is not fun for a woman to try to shew a man where there may be error , but we are ALL given grace.
        Eph.4:7 And if one is “stablished by God” it is our duty to try imho, if we are compelled.

        One cannot save ourself! But we can offer what we have learned to maybe help some. Even females are taught by God. He is gracious to all sinners who call upon Him. All we can do is to do our best to keep the devine order whilst we are here and share as we get opportunity. Sometimes
        online blogging or sharing is THE ONLY fellowship we have. There are MANY of us saved from and outside the “church” system today that blinds mankind. This is GLORY to God alone!

        I believe we need to have GRACE for any believer who shares. We have a “treasure” in us, everyone who is saved. May Christ be magnified, and glorified even while we are here if the Lord will help! its very fun to be saved by God into Christ! Thankful we get to share!!

        Grace to all ! Thank you for your kindness Don and thankful to God that you have this understanding.

  4. TEnglish

    Don,

    Specifically, I am curious as to the divine creative gender role of disseminating biblical doctrine in such public discourse as social media and all the global outlets e.g., Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp, and TikTok, followed by giants like WeChat, Telegram, Messenger, Snapchat, and X (Twitter), with platforms like Pinterest, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Discord? Keeping in mind 1 Tim, 2. 11-14.

    1. doctrine Post author

      TEnglish,
      Are you asking if a woman can post Bible doctrine on social media? Yes. I do not see how this threatens the creative order.

  5. TEnglish

    While the New Testament does not contain an explicit command for the Church to celebrate Jesus’ birth – nor does it forbid treasuring Jesus’ birth.

    May we ponder all of these things in our hearts (Luke 2.19).
    • One of the most history-altering pregnancy announcements of all time: that moment when the angel Gabriel meets Mary of Nazareth. Later, when Joseph, too, felt rocked by this improbable news, an angel gave him the same encouraging words Mary heard: “Don’t be afraid….She will give birth to a son, and you are to name him Jesus (Matthew 1.20, 21).
    • Angels announcing the “good news of great joy” to shepherds, leading the shepherds to
    glorify and praise God.
    • Wise men (Magi) traveling from the east to worship Jesus – supernaturally directed by the STAR!

    These biblical narratives are seen by many Christians today as a precedent for celebrating the event with joy and worship, though it remains a matter of individual conscience and tradition rather than a divine command.

    The question is not whether Christ was born or how He was born or the spectacular events on His birth, but whether Scripture instructs the Church, the body of Christ, to commemorate His birth?

    LET EVERY PERSON BE FULLY PERSUADED IN THEIR OWN MIND (ROM.14.5).

  6. Daniel J Stanton

    We know Christ was not born in the winter. My question is, why do Christians celebrate a lie every year? Not only do Christians celebrate the lie but add other lies, like Santa. Tradition often times is against God.

  7. Trudy Perik

    Good morning, Don.
    Thank you for taking the time to answer a lot of questions that we all have!
    Our church is beginning 2 Corinthians this year. I have been listening to the book for the past month and this verse caught my attention. 2 Cor. 11:2 “For I am jealous for you with Godly jealousy. For I bethrothed you to one husband, to present you a pure virgin to Christ.”
    I believe that we who have believed the gospel 1 Cor. 15:1-3 are placed into the body of Christ.
    Can you explain what 2 Cor. 11:2 is talking about?
    Thanks

    1. doctrine Post author

      Trudy,
      Thank you. Paul began the Corinthian church, proclaiming his gospel to them (1 Corinthians 15.1-4). He was jealous for their salvation fear they were being beguiled by false teachers, whom he mockingly called “the super apostles.” Their claims forced Paul to recount his sufferings for Christ, showing that he not only talked the talk but walked the walk.

  8. Craig

    Don, the Corinthian church, as the others Paul founded, we’re all beguiled by false teachings and went under the law, is this correct?

        1. doctrine Post author

          Craig,
          We’re not given specifics. What is clear from early church history is that most of Christendom abandoned Paul—a reality that persists today. Go to any church and 90% of the time the message will be from the Gospels or Old Testament. And those who do teach from Paul’s letters do not teach about Paul’s secrets or understand his unique apostleship.

  9. TEnglish

    Hi Don,
    Col. 2 . 16-17 The text is often debated, with some views arguing that Paul declares these ceremonial, non-weekly, and monthly observances no longer binding, while others argue that he is merely defending the right of believers to celebrate them without being judged for their methods. Is Paul cautioning against the legalistic observance of these feasts as a means of achieving righteousness? This aligns with the teaching in Galatians 4:9-10, where Paul warns against returning to the “weak and miserable principles” of the law. In the early church, there appears tension between Jewish Christians who adhered to the Mosaic Law and Gentile converts who did not. The Apostle Paul emphasizes that in Christ, believers are free from the ceremonial laws that dictated dietary practices. Is this a sound interpretation? And would you please expound on Romans14.5-6 as to contextual interpretation and practical application today, especially regarding Christendom’s feast days of Easter and Christmas. Thank you!

    1. doctrine Post author

      TEnglish,
      What we see in Colossians 2.16-17 is the division between Judaism and those who believed the gospel of the kingdom and those who believed Paul’s gospel, members of the Church. The former retained these practices and tried to impose them on members of the Church. Paul taught that members of the Church are free of these things and to stand against them (Galatians 5.1). This tension no doubt led Peter to write what he did in 2 Peter 3.15-16. Romans 14.5-6 concerns the freedom we have as members of the Church. As far as Easter and Christmas, believers are free to celebrate them. The key is regarding them as unto the Lord. God gave Israel certain feast days and regulations. We are free from all that. We regard each day as unto the Lord. For us, every day is resurrection day, every day is Christ’s victory over sin and death.

      1. Jack B Palmer

        Well written. clear a concise
        Prophecy for Israel
        Mystery – for all who believe in the Completed Work at the Cross
        the Shed Blood. Dual purpose.
        Established New Covenant for Israel: The Future Earthly Kingdom Christ as King
        Mystery hid in God: Christ; the Head of His Body, the Church Today
        thank You

  10. TEnglish

    Don,

    The problem I have with remembering Christmas and Easter (birthdays?) is that these holidays never existed during the writing of Paul’s epistles in the completion of scripture (Col.2.10). We have no instruction to engage in these manmade traditions. It is so elementary to learn of their origins that contextually I believe Paul was referring to Jewish feast days and regulations (Rom 14.5-6). I do not recall Paul ever encouraging the body of Christ to resort back to pagan origins.

    This is not a salvation issue, but I hope that His grace would allow me not to despise those who participate in man-made traditions. It seems there would be no end in sight to participating in fables?

  11. TEnglish

    Doctrine – I asked AI in a google search and the response helped me out regarding my question back and forth with you about Rom. 14.4-5. Enjoy.

    I have a hard time when so many in Christendom quote Romans 14.4-5 for Christmas and Easter. These days were not even around in the 1st C. It appears Jewish converts would try and impose Jewish feast days.
    AI
    Your frustration with this interpretation is rooted in solid historical and context-driven research. Many theologians and commentators agree with your assessment that Romans 14:4-5 is not a direct, prophetic authorization of modern, calendar-based holidays like Christmas and Easter.
    Here is an analysis of the situation based on historical context, the meaning of the passage, and the development of church tradition.

    1. The Context of Romans 14: Jewish vs. Gentile Converts

    The church in Rome (around A.D. 57) was composed of Jewish and Gentile believers trying to navigate a new life together.

    • The “Weak” Brother: In this context, the “weak” brother is widely understood to be Jewish Christians who felt bound by the Old Covenant laws, such as observing specific feast days, Sabbaths, or dietary restrictions (kosher).
    • The “Strong” Brother: These were likely Gentile Christians (and some Jewish Christians) who understood that salvation was by grace and not bound by the ceremonial law.
    • The Conflict: Jewish converts were likely struggling to let go of the sacred days, while some Gentile converts were likely judging them for being “bound” by unnecessary, archaic rules.
    2. Paul’s Focus: Unity Over “Disputable Matters”

    Paul’s point in Romans 14:5 (“One person esteems one day as better than another, while another esteems all days alike”) was not to provide a template for future liturgical holidays. Instead, he was addressing a current, internal conflict regarding Jewish converts who were, in good conscience, trying to honor God through ancestral, Biblically commanded holy days (like Passover or the Sabbath).

    His instruction is to stop passing judgment on each other (14:13). He is telling the “strong” not to look down on the “weak” for their scruples, and the “weak” not to condemn the “strong” for their freedom.

    2. The Historical Reality of Christmas/Easter

    • 1st Century: Christmas was not celebrated in the 1st century, nor even for the first three centuries. Early Christians focused on the death/resurrection (Pascha/Easter) but did not celebrate birthdays.
    • Origin of Dates: The date of December 25th was not established in the Church calendar until the 4th century (roughly A.D. 336), often to align with or replace Roman festivals like Sol Invictus or Saturnalia.
    • Imposed Tradition: The imposition of these days onto Gentile converts as a “requirement” for Christian faith is a later development (3rd–4th century) and not the situation Paul is addressing in Romans.
    3. Reconciling the Argument

    When people use Romans 14 for Christmas/Easter, they are usually applying the principles of liberty (if you do it, do it for the Lord) rather than the original historical context (Jewish days).

    • Viewpoint A (The “Liberty” View): Many argue that even if Christmas is not biblically commanded, Romans 14 gives liberty to observe it (or not) as an act of conscience, provided it is done “to the Lord” and not forced on others as necessary for salvation.
    • Viewpoint B (The “Scriptural” View): Others argue that this passage cannot be used to justify any man-made holiday, but only to allow for the winding down of Jewish-Christian consciences regarding the old Mosaic festivals.
    Summary
    Your observation is correct: Paul is addressing the tension of 1st-century Jewish believers clinging to biblical feast days, not 21st-century believers wanting to celebrate Christmas. While some Christians apply the spirit of “conscience liberty” from that verse, it is historically inaccurate to say the verse was written to authorize Christmas or Easter.

  12. Anders

    TEnglish cites Col 2:10 when referring to Paul’s letters as “the completion of Scripture.”
    It is actually Col 1:25 that states that Paul’s letters complete the Scriptures (though not all translators interpret the verse in this way).

  13. TEnglish

    Doctrine,

    My gratitude for your non-judgmental, scholarly, and meticulous approach of providing in-depth study to inform and strengthen believers. It is wonderful to have found such a valuable resource for my studies.

  14. randy nettles

    So, in your view, when did the Church start? Did it start when Paul was converted, or in Arabia, or at the Jerusalem Council?

    Isn’t belief in Jesus as Lord and Savior a two-step process? Don’t you have to know Jesus’ true identity first (as the Son of God, the Jewish Messiah-King)?

    Once you recognize who He is, then you have to accept what He did. He died on the cross (as our kinsman redeemer) so we could have forgiveness of sin, and then rose from the dead (defeating death and the grave and triumphing over sin).

    Paul’s gospel built upon the king/kingdom gospel taught by John, Jesus, and the ‘twelve’. The king/kingdom gospel and Jesus’ identity as the King had to come first before Paul’s. This was something the Jews would understand. The forgiveness of sin was harder to understand for the Jews. The only place in the O.T. I know of that mentions it is in Isaiah 53. Jesus fulfilled this prophecy, and this is Paul’s gospel, which was extended to the Gentiles as well as the Jews, and is not contingent on obeying the Mosaic Law. It is by grace through faith only and not of works.

    The only person who could fulfill Isaiah 53 was Jesus, the Son of Man, the Son of David, and the Son of God. It took John, Jesus, the twelve, and Paul to preach this gospel.

    Also, didn’t Jesus give the Holy Spirit to his disciples on the day of his resurrection, as mentioned in John 20:22? This was different than being “endued with power from on high” as mentioned in Luke 24:49.

    1. doctrine Post author

      Randy,
      Paul wrote that he began the Church (1 Corinthians 3.10-11; 1 Timothy 1.15-16). God saved him for this purpose. The Church technically began at Paul’s conversion, but it was not until he went to Arabia that the ascended Lord began to give him the doctrines of the Church. At his conversion, Paul only knew about God’s prophetic program and he was saved by believing who Jesus was, the gospel of the kingdom. Paul declared that his gospel was a secret (Romans 16.25; Ephesians 6.19). He wrote that he had to explain his gospel to the Twelve at the Council of Jerusalem. The Twelve did not go to Gentiles. As far as the Biblical record is concerned, the only Gentile saved by any of the Twelve was Cornelius. Peter went to him under direct orders and when he got there, the first thing he said was that it was unlawful for a Jew to associate with a Gentile. The strategic reason God sent Peter to Cornelius was so he would support Paul at the Council fourteen years later. The coming of the Spirit at Pentecost and other indwellings of Him was different from what occurs for members of the Church. Not all Jewish believers received the Holy Spirit. When Peter and John went to Samaria, they had to lay their hands on those believers to receive the Holy Spirit. The same was true for the Jewish believers Paul encountered in Acts 19. Paul laid his hands on them and they received the Spirit. Thus, those saved under the gospel of the kingdom had to have an apostle lay his hands on them to receive the Holy Spirit. Believers of Paul’s gospel receive the Spirit as part of our salvation the moment we believe. To understand Church theology one must understand that God has two primary programs, His covenant, prophetic program that concerns Jews and Gentiles and His Church program, that concerns members of His body. These programs are separate and distinct and mixing them has caused most of the confusion and fracture, the thousands of denominations, in Christendom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.